Samsung Galaxy S7 S7 bordo dei prezzi, le caratteristiche e le specifiche Samsung Galaxy sorpassa iPhone di Apple US sales. Galaxy S7 batte iPhone 6S spedizioni in American market. The nuovo Samsung Galaxy S7 lanciato nel febbraio di quest'anno a fianco del bordo Galaxy S7 Qui abbiamo arrotondare tutte le ultime notizie sul Samsung Galaxy S7, tra cui data di uscita, prezzo, le voci, e il bordo features. Samsung Galaxy S7 e S7 Galaxy in un glance. Samsung Galaxy S7 e S7 Galaxy data di lancio bordo 21 February. Galaxy S7 e S7 bordo in vendita nella Regno Unito 11 prezzo March. Galaxy S7 Regno Unito da 599 inc VAT. Galaxy S7 prezzo bordo da 639 inc VAT. Samsung Galaxy S7 ultima news.15 07 2016 Samsung s vendite di smartphone hanno superato gli iPhone negli Stati Uniti, grazie alle forti vendite di Galaxy S7.According la ricerca da Kantor World Panel, nei tre mesi fino a maggio di quest'anno, Samsung ha rappresentato il 37 per cento delle vendite di smartphone e Apple 29 per cent. However, tra i telefoni di punta, si trattava di una chiamata più stretto con il Galaxy S7 S7 bordo pari al 16 per cento delle vendite e delle 6s iPhone 6s Plus al 14 6 per la ricerca cent. The anche scoperto solo il cinque per cento di Samsung acquisti provenivano da coloro che si spostano da Apple, mentre il 14 per cento degli acquirenti di Apple spostato da Samsung. nel Regno Unito, è una cosa più profonda tra la contabilità per il 36 per cento delle vendite in questo market.11 07 2016 rinforzate Galaxy S7 modello attivo Samsung s ha fallito un test di resistenza all'acqua, nonostante in possesso di un rating. This acqua-resistenza certificazione IP68 presumibilmente garantisce un dispositivo in grado di sopravvivere full immersion in un massimo di cinque piedi di acqua per un massimo di 30 minuti, ma la S7 attivo non è riuscito a vivere fino a queste affermazioni se sottoposti a prove da organizzazione di test di prodotto di consumo Reports. After di essere immessi in un serbatoio pressurizzato all'equivalente di cinque piedi di acqua per 30 minuti, il display venne oscurata da linee verdi, con umidità bolle visibili in entrambe le lenti della fotocamera, il gruppo said. After primo dispositivo fallito, i tecnici hanno presentato una seconda unità alla stessa prova la seconda dispositivo anche omesso, né con il modello di tornare alla piena funzionalità. Il dispositivo attivo Samsung Galaxy S7 è uno dei telefoni più robusti fino ad oggi ed è altamente resistente ai graffi e certificata IP68, ha detto la società in un comunicato di Consumer Reports, ma ha ammesso ci può essere un off-chance che un dispositivo difettoso non è quanto a tenuta stagna come dovrebbe essere, e ha detto che sta studiando la matter. Waterproofing è stato un importante punto di vendita-gamma Galaxy S di Samsung s, soprattutto dopo che è stato reintegrato per l'ultima generazione è una caratteristica particolarmente importante della S7 attivo, come è stato progettato per l'uso in ambienti difficili, all'aperto environments. Consumer Report ha rilevato che di tutti gli attuali modelli di Galaxy S7, S7 attivo è stato l'unico a fallire il test di immersione, sia con la S7 e S7 bordo passing.28 06 2016 Samsung è impostato per rilasciare una edizione limitata Galaxy S7 bordo in tempo per le Olimpiadi del 2016 che si svolgono in Brasile il mese prossimo, Trusted Reviews reports. An immagine presumibilmente che mostra le nuove edizioni è trapelata da evleaks Evan Blass, con i telefoni raffigurati featuting gli anelli olimpici logoat la parte inferiore della parte posteriore insieme con l'oro blu dettagli intorno il tasto Home, auricolari e telecamere module. As osserva il rapporto, la rivelazione è stata precedentemente previsto da SamMobile sulla base di Samsung s precedenti Olimpiadi di tie-in traino con il Galaxy S line.08 06 2016 il Samsung Galaxy S7 ha appena ricevuto una nuova aggiunta, nella forma del Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. For chi rifugio t venire attraverso la linea attiva di Samsung s, si ri versioni rugged della sua linea di punta, progettato per essere utilizzato in tutte le condizione atmosferica e environments. This significa che, oltre a regolare l'acqua IP68 S7 s e polvere-impermeabilizzazione, la S7 attiva viene inoltre fornito con un guscio in gomma taglio armato che s goccia a prova ad una altezza di cinque metri lo schermo è anche presunto infrangibile, anche se abbiamo wouldn necessariamente non vogliamo testare che out. The più grande aggiornamento, tuttavia, è quello della batteria la batteria S7 attiva s è un terzo più grande rispetto allo standard S7, portando la propria capacità totale a 4,000mAh Ciò significa che non solo si può prendere kayak o farlo cadere in un burrone, la S7 Active è in grado di alimentare attraverso almeno un giorno intero in wilderness. There è un piccolo problema, però - e disponibile solo in America, e solo attraverso la rete carrier AT T Samsung non ha rivelato quando o se il S7 attivo verrà a altri territori, ma in base alle scarse vendite dei precedenti dispositivi attivi, ci piacerebbe essere sorpreso se fatto al Europe.02 06 2016 Samsung ha annunciato un nuovo versione Batman di ispirazione del bordo Galaxy S7 Soprannominata la Edition ingiustizia, il telefono viene fornito in nero con rifiniture d'oro C'è anche un simbolo di Batman sul back. In un video di unboxing il telefono viene fornito con le cuffie, custodia protettiva un'armatura in stile Batman , e un auricolare realtà virtuale l'interfaccia utente è stata leggermente modificata per dare più di un tema Batman sembra anche includere un videogioco con il telefono Gotham superhero. The commemora il terzo anniversario del popolare gioco mobile, l'ingiustizia Gods Among Us il gioco presenta una scheda meccanico da collezione e impegna i giocatori in 3-on-3 di combattimento tag team che caratterizzano molti dei telefono characters. The più iconico DC s sarà disponibile dal 13 giugno Nessun prezzo è stato fissato per lo smartphone apparirà esclusivamente in selezionare territori, tra cui Cina, Singapore, Corea, America Latina e Russia ci sono attualmente parola su un UK launch.17 05 2016 Samsung offrirà nuovi Galaxy S7 e S7 clienti bordo un esclusivo pacchetto di contenuti ingranaggi VR, nel senso che possono mettere le mani l'auricolare Samsung Gear VR per un prezzo scontato, a fianco di un fascio privo di giochi ed esperienze per rendere la maggior parte della realtà virtuale headset. Content incluso nel pacchetto è Anshar Wars 2, Darknet, Drift, continuare a parlare e nessuno Esplode, Ocean Rift e StarChart, anche se né Oculus né Samsung hanno annunciato quanto il prezzo scontato salverà i clienti sul prezzo di vendita al dettaglio. Il nostro bordo Galaxy S7 e S7 sta eseguendo molto bene, dimostrando continua forte domanda per i nostri dispositivi premio di punta, David Lowes, chief marketing officer di Samsung Electronics Europe, ha detto. Lo smartphone è già così fondamentale per la nostra vita, ma collegandolo con un prodotto come il Gear VR apre incredibili nuove esperienze che sono spesso emotivo in quanto sono coinvolgente Con questo nuovo incentivo, abbiamo ri incoraggiando una più ampia adozione VR in modo che più persone possono sperimentare questa nuova straordinaria tecnologia per themselves. Samsung ha venduto 300.000 cuffie ingranaggi VR in Europa finora quest'anno, con il set di mercato di realtà virtuale a crescere 168 per cento anno su anno nel 2016 in base al CCS Insight. A Oculus, vogliamo che la gente di sperimentare qualsiasi cosa, ovunque attraverso il potere della realtà virtuale e abbiamo ri cominciando a vedere che succede con l'ingranaggio VR, ha detto Max Cohen, capo della Mobile sul Oculus Insieme, l'hardware e il software di fornire la migliore esperienza in assoluto VR su cellulare disponibili oggi e noi stiamo cercando ora di continuare a emozionare e coinvolgere consumers.13 europea 05 2016 il Samsung Galaxy S7 e S7 bordo sono impostati a guidare il mercato degli smartphone Usa nel secondo trimestre del 2016, secondo la nuova data. Kantar Worldpanel ha rilasciato i dati che evidenziano il continuo successo di Samsung Galaxy s S7, che ha rappresentato quasi il 6 per cento delle vendite di smartphone negli Stati Uniti durante il primo trimestre, nonostante solo di essere rilasciato nel marzo 11.This rende la S7 e S7 bordo il quinto più venduto smartphone in questo periodo, e il posizionamento di Samsung s è impostato per salire ancora più in alto nella seconda quarter. Amongst coloro che hanno acquistato il dispositivo di marzo, la durata della batteria, la qualità della fotocamera, la capacità di archiviazione e velocità di elaborazione sono stati tutti fortemente citati come incentives.07 04 2016 Samsung spera che le vendite del suo smartphone Galaxy 7 alimenteranno un balzo del 10 per cento del risultato operativo per il primo trimestre del produttore di telefonia 2016.The Corea del Sud predice il suo utile operativo per raggiungere 6 6000 miliardi di won coreano 3 9 miliardi tra gennaio e marzo di quest'anno , rispetto ai 6000 miliardi vinto nello stesso periodo dello scorso year. It arriva dopo il Galaxy S7 lanciato a fine febbraio a buone recensioni, tra cui la nostra, con il modello di battere i record nei display degli smartphone, come ad esempio la massima precisione del colore vetta più alta luminosità e dello schermo più alta resolution. The dispositivo è ampiamente creduto di essere vendendo bene, e Samsung rilascerà i suoi risultati del primo trimestre entro la fine month.04 04 2016 il Samsung Galaxy S7 ha subito una riduzione di prezzo di circa 150 negli Stati Uniti Secondo la CNN, Walmart è in possesso di un la promozione di ripristino su questi telefoni e 100 su tutti gli iPhone di Apple fino alla fine di sconti June. The applica al iPhone 6, 6 Plus, 6S, nuovo quattro pollici SE, e il Samsung Galaxy 6 e 7.01 04 2016 la data di uscita per una dei principali concorrenti del Galaxy s S7 - HTC 10 probabilmente - è stato annunciato come Martedì 12 April. There è un flusso in diretta in corso a 1pm ora di Londra per il dispositivo, che potrebbe essere chiamato il HTC 10 o HTC One M10, a seconda su cui voce si ascolta to. Leaks suggerire l'HTC 10 avrà un nuovo design dello chassis, 5 1in 2K risoluzione dello schermo di supporto Super LCD, non AMOLED, una fotocamera posteriore da 12 megapixel e sono disponibili in una varietà di colori interni, ci si aspetta di caratterizzato da un processore Snapdragon 820, 4GB di RAM, memoria interna da 32 GB con supporto microSD, e un 3,000mAh battery. With un atteso il lancio di maggio, dopo l'annuncio di aprile, HTC è abbastanza tardi nel lancio di un nuovo telefono cellulare di quest'anno, con i rivali LG e Samsung - e anche Apple - vista cellulari siano già stati immessi in carta 2016.On, queste specifiche sono anche molto simile al Galaxy S7, dalla dimensione dello schermo di storage per le specifiche della fotocamera, in modo da HTC avrà bisogno di tirare fuori qualcosa di molto speciale per poter competere. Messaggio navigation. Galaxy S7 sistema utilizza fino 8 GB out of the Box, ma è possibile spostare Apps per SD. Remember quel grande puzza che è stato fatto su Samsung non permettendo per Android 6 0 Marshmallow s Adoptable bagagli caratterizzato Bene, questo è proprio qui è il motivo gente ha gettato un po 'di una misura Fuori dalla scatola, il Samsung Galaxy S7 utilizza fino 8GB del telefono s 32GB per applicazioni di sistema e TouchWiz e qualsiasi altra cosa Samsung ha pre-caricato che sa quarto di tutta la vostra memoria interna, per dirla un altro modo che non s good. As si può vedere dall'immagine qui sopra, prima ancora completato l'installazione sul mio Galaxy S7 abbiamo unboxed qui, ero giù a circa metà della mia stoccaggio 32GB disponibile In realtà, l'immagine mostra che io ho usato sotto 16GB totale, ma io m applicazioni ancora l'installazione e ho già saltato oltre il giro di boa e ora hanno intorno 15 GB a sinistra per usare Se fossi un proprietario di smartphone tipico che mantiene un telefono cellulare per due anni, 15GB isn t lasciandomi molto spazio per installare applicazioni to. People si lamentavano per la mancanza di stoccaggio adottabili, perché presumevano che pesanti app-installatori sarebbero eseguire rapidamente di spazio per installare ulteriori applicazioni Se si guarda la mia situazione, che potrebbe facilmente accadere Tuttavia, dopo aver scavato in giro per il impostazioni del Galaxy S7 stoccaggio, ho notato che Samsung sta ancora che consente di spostare le applicazioni per schede SD, proprio come hanno fatto in passato Prendere un look. I correva attraverso questo processo con una serie di applicazioni che ho installato tramite Google Play che le applicazioni di sistema weren t dai giochi alle applicazioni aerei per Google Analytics tutti Let me li muovo al mio 200GB SD Se ho strappato la scheda SD, che hanno portato via tutte quelle applicazioni e hanno detto che erano legati alla scheda SD che s un po ' sorprendente, dal momento che il Moto X Pure Edition doesn t permettono di farlo vedere di persona here. So, Samsung può utilizzare fino 8 GB di spazio per le applicazioni ei servizi di sistema, ma sono ancora consentendo di spostare le applicazioni su una scheda SD alla libera lo spazio sulla partizione interna che sa buon segno, soprattutto perché si può mettere in un massimo di 200 GB schede SD nella S7 o S7 EDGE e ora potrebbe essere un buon momento per acquistare questo 200GB SanDisk microSD da Amazon. Feeling meglio per la situazione di archiviazione. ADDITIONAL COVERAGE. Post navigation. I hanno un problema leggermente diverso ho comprato un GB SD 64, ma il mio menù di memorizzazione non sembra permettermi di spostare qualsiasi applicazioni ad esso I don t avere una schermata come quella mostrata sopra, e può sembrare t di trovare ovunque nei vari menu in cui questa opzione è offerto Questo più o meno rende il telefono inutile per me non c'è dubbio che la sua mi non riuscendo a trovare qualcosa di proprio di fronte a me si dovrebbe vedere me in un negozio di ferramenta, ma forse non Eventuali suggerimenti là fuori. non m avendo alcuna fortuna con lo spostamento avrà qualche minuto 10 minutes. Unfortunately sembra un sacco di giochi e applicazioni VR andare direttamente nella memoria interna e molti di loro può essere spostata in modo t Samsung sembra aver sparato i loro piani di dominio del mondo VR nel piede omettendo adattativo storage. I m così bloccato ho il Galaxy S7 Edge con una scheda SD Samsung 128GB inserito io ho formattato la scheda SD mentre è nel telefono e cercato di spostare le applicazioni sopra, ma il telefono si comporta come la scheda SD inserita isn t mie applicazioni hanno l'icona scheda SD trasparente il telefono mostra quando si rimuove la scheda SD dopo aver spostato le applicazioni su qualsiasi tips. I è riuscito a spostare un sacco di mie applicazioni per la SD, ma per qualche motivo che posso t vedere i file in Esplora e il mio isn bagagli t indicati con precisione mostra ancora c'è solo 2gb utilizzato sul mio SD, anche se io ho trasferito su un valore 6Gb s di roba tramite Manager App ho riavviato il telefono è anche questo normale o fatto qualcosa andare wrong. I era molto deluso per scoprire che disabilitato questa funzione Permettere la scheda SD per essere montato come memoria interna risolve il seguente problems.1 non tutte le applicazioni possono trasferito a SD siete in balia dello sviluppatore 2 Anche se le applicazioni possono essere spostato nella SD spesso volte essi sono solo parzialmente spostati alcuni dell'app risiede sulla SD e un po 'sulla memoria interna 3 cache cresce e cresce applicazioni come Pinterest utilizzare GB s cache Si sa doppio smacco Sì, la cache stata cancellata, ma che le sconfitte lo scopo di una cache di 4 In quasi tutti i casi, dopo un aggiornamento app e qualche aggiornamento applicazioni spesso si sposta di nuovo nella memoria interna a questo punto è necessario spostare manualmente indietro al SD Questo può essere molto noioso e richiede tempo a seconda della numero di applicazioni si sa loop. i vizioso appena ricevuto il mio nuovo bordo S7 sembra un sacco di mie applicazioni mi non offrire la possibilità di spostare verso l'esterno e im già a 32 sul mio non interno così felice qualsiasi help. Well 8GB è un passo nella giusta direzione, penso che il mio S6 ha avuto 22 23 disponibile da una tabula rasa, ma che quello che succede quando si ottiene un vettore di marca device. I pensano, mentre è bene che ancora permettono la App2sd ma i geek può sapere come fare ma il consumatore generale dovrà idea di come fare questo la quantità di memoria di sinistra è ridiculous.15gb sinistra è diminutivo in questi giorni con tutti i giochi di app e molti hanno ottenuto più grandi dimensioni sembra sempre ottengono qualcosa di giusto e poi avvitare in da qualche altra parte io sto indovinando la ragione sono andati con il 32GB è stato quello di mantenere il costo del telefono down. Samsung fornisce un altro motivo per cui da 16 GB dovrebbe mai descrivere la capacità di memoria del telefono in questo giorno ed età dovrebbe essere utilizzato solo per descrivere la quantità di RAM presente nel computer. So dimmi di nuovo Perché hanno rimuovono stoccaggio adottabile vorrei capire se ci fosse problemi di incompatibilità o problemi differenza di velocità tra UFS e la scheda SD, ma questo, hanno lasciato questa funzione rimanere questo è fondamentalmente un mezza versione asino di stoccaggio adottabili Anche HTC A9 lasciato la caratteristica come è il motivo per rimuovere un appassionato gratuito feature. I amichevoli possono t ricordare il motivo esatto, ma Samsung e LG hanno entrambi dichiarato che didn t vogliono disabilitare stoccaggio adottabile, ma il modo in cui Google implementato lo ha reso troppo di una seccatura o impossibile lasciarlo abilitato I don t o meno che è vero, ma sembra legittimo da LG e Samsung hanno detto la stessa cosa io non vedo alcun beneficio per loro disattivazione, quindi è sembrerebbe logico che lo hanno fatto solo perché avevano to. Because se si installa una scheda SD e utilizzare lo stoccaggio adottabili, si formatta la scheda ci sarebbe un sacco di persone che gettano carte con foto esistenti, documenti personali, ecc e inavvertitamente eliminarli Poi indovina chi ottiene la colpa Samsung o LG, non Google S7 entrambi optato fuori di quel sostegno particolare PR nightmare. OK sì che capisco, ma non è come se una funzione di formattazione automatica Si sa la scelta dell'utente di lasciare così com'è o combinare stoccaggio nasconderlo in opzioni sviluppatore o qualcosa Probabilmente wouldn t attivare o pasticcio con la funzione se si non sapevo che cosa fa, come ho detto HTC ha sulla A9 non è un problema, il più piccolo dei 3 companies. Also sono sicuro che avrebbe per richiedere di eliminare la carta prima di farlo se lo si fa dopo che poi colpa tua è possibile t rendere tutto a prova di idiota o saremmo ancora colpire l'altro con bastoni in funzione woods. The avverte l'utente che la scheda SD viene formattata e consiglia agli utenti di eseguire il backup dei propri dati prima di usarlo come memoria interna, e si ll anche consigliare di non utilizzare la funzione se la scheda l'utente ha è lento Dato che s come è in magazzino Android, i don t acquistare l'intera teoria PR disastro Con un chiaro avvertimento taglio già incluso di default, è colpa degli utenti per non leggerlo beforehand. Then si ri enormemente sotto a rating il livello di conoscenza dei lettori medi degli utenti di questo forum non lo sono utente medio e vi garantisco che, se tale opzione è stata automatica, il supporto tecnico di Samsung s e nel personale del punto vendita sarebbe stata invasa da persone che eliminati loro grande kid s primi passi maggior parte delle persone prendono la scheda SD dal loro vecchio telefono e incollarla in quello nuovo in questo caso tutti i dati sarebbe wiped. It s non è automatico né si ri dato una notifica pop-up la prima volta che si inserisce una scheda e si chiede in che modo si prevede di utilizzare e di uso naturalmente come memoria interna viene fornito con un avvertimento nella descrizione se ignorate o all'utente di scegliere l'uso come storage portatile, l'utente non è tormentava e la caratteristica rimane accessibile nelle impostazioni Forse sto sopravvalutare il Joe medio che non so cambiando lanciatore è una cosa, ma ho ancora trovato decisione Samsung s per essere ridicolo Se così volevano proteggere gli utenti, che potrebbero ve nascosti sotto sviluppatore opzioni molto altra considerazione è che non voglio le mie applicazioni ei dati delle applicazioni su un supporto di memorizzazione che è vicino a 50 volte più lento del mio a bordo storage che non è in tema con quello che stai dicendo io sono d'accordo che avrebbero dovuto metterlo in Opzioni sviluppatore, ma io d personalmente mai utilizzare la funzione Troppo compromesso prestazioni e del potenziale rischio per failure. As mio attuale S4 è da 16 GB, 32 è un miglioramento immediatamente pensare che io ve praticamente deciso la S7 per i miei upgrade. This è una buona notizia e calma la mia più grande paura in questo momento ho proprio le 6s iPhone plus 128GB come mio personale e il 64GB Galaxy S6 come il mio telefono aziendale così cadere giù a un telefono da 32 GB è un grosso problema e un grande compromesso preferisco memoria interna su schede di memoria e mi piace che il mio iPhone può contenere tutte le mie applicazioni, giochi, foto, film, musica, e video musicali senza essere costretti ad acquistare una scheda di memoria Speriamo che il prossimo anno Samsung riporta l'opzione 64GB Invece di ottenere il GS7 ho intenzione di provare il bordo come il mio telefono aziendale quest'anno a causa della più grande della batteria Grande articolo e grazie per il dispositivo info. Just radice ur e rimuovere applicazioni di sistema u Don t need. my s compagno è sempre 98 ogni ora nei giorni internet. two fa nuova McLaren F1 ha acquistato dopo aver conseguito 18.512 questo era il mio mese precedente s stipendio, e-poco più, 17k il mese scorso 3 -5 giorni hrofworka con le porte aperte in più stipendi settimanali e 's davvero il lavoro più semplice che abbia mai ho aderito a questa 7 mesi fa e ora facendo più di 87, più a destra qui O 323 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 o 323.Wait per la sorprendente notizia da parte di Apple, nessun altro telefono offrirà loro di memorizzazione standard, 32g per il modello entry level nel 2016, innovativo e in anticipo sui tempi si parla hanno anche inventato una cosa chiamata registrazione stereo, e il 2017 poteva essere l'anno in cui in mostra una cosa che chiamano la ruota di Apple, come una ruota normale, ma due volte il segno cost. Wow, un commento colpire Apple, come originale so che hai niente di grande da offrire che gli attacchi immaturi su Apple, triste. OK devo chiedere questo perché qualcuno dovrebbe pagare prezzi di iPhone per un dispositivo Android che comprende anche bloatware Accettare di bloatware di solito significa che si ottiene il prodotto più economico don t comprare un computer con bloatware e pagare lo stesso prezzo di uno che doesn t così perché dovrebbe pensi che sia OK a che fare con gli smartphone Alcuni potrebbero dire che stai pagando per più specifiche Beh lasciatemi dire questo i dispositivi Android devono avere specifiche meglio di iPhone per eseguire in modo simile al iPhone nel test di benchmark Questo perché il OS Android è un molto più potere OS fame di iOS è Quindi, in pratica questi dispositivi Android devono avere queste specifiche aggiunto per competere Se avete mai provato un dispositivo Android con le stesse specifiche come un iDevice, si vedrebbe che cosa sto parlando vi è alcun motivo a pagare per mettere in su con bloatware solo perché Samsung ha a spendere di più per le parti a fare i loro dispositivi eseguono simile a iPhone Samsung sta pagando soldi in più per rendere i dispositivi più costosi perché don t vuole spendere i soldi per sviluppare il proprio sistema operativo dal graffio che è meno potere fame e Tizen non è da zero esso s basato su Android se si va con più potere operativo fame bisogna alimentarlo specifiche migliori per eseguire che è tutto c'è da it. IOS è terrible. You hanno chiaramente mai possedeva un iDevice o si wouldn t avete fatto quel commento Fammi abbattere tutti i vantaggi iOS ha più di sicurezza di Android, Privacy, Quality of Games e stabilità delle prestazioni iOS ottiene molto meno di malware di Android e mentre il 75 di iDevices sono su iOS 9, mentre circa la metà degli utenti di Android sono in KitKat o versioni precedenti di Android con meno di 10 degli utenti di Android su Android 6 Qualità di applicazioni e giochi sono anche meglio su iOS perché gli sviluppatori a sviluppare i giochi applicazioni su iOS poi porta loro di Android La ragione per questo non è solo perché gli sviluppatori preferiscono usando C su Java, ma anche per il 75 del loro reddito proviene da iOS che innumerevoli articoli sottolineano entrambi i fatti inoltre ci sono 85 più bug in dispositivi Android rispetto ai dispositivi iOS dispositivi Android congelano più, crash di più e riavviare più di iDevices i vantaggi di Android affermazione utente Android ha più di iOS sono le stesse ragioni che hanno scelto Android su iOS per cominciare e che s perché la maggior parte che acquistano i dispositivi Android possono t permettersi un iPhone, ad esempio Android è possibile installare cracking giochi Applicazioni senza bisogno di jailbreak o radice Tutto questo significa gli utenti Android possono permettersi di acquistare applicazioni giochi in modo da lato carico i giochi applicazioni incrinato e poi ci domandiamo perché finiscono con il malware sul loro dispositivo secondo scusa è dispositivi Android hanno schede SD Dimmi un caso si potrebbe prendere un 32 GB telefono Android e anche riempire una scheda SD da 256 GB con Games 'doesn t accadere perché la metà di quella dei dati rimane sul interna Si realtà è meglio avere un dispositivo da 128 GB di un dispositivo a 32 GB con una scheda da 256 SD il fatto è la gente tende a comprare Android perché possono t permettersi un iPhone solo pochi eletti in realtà sono disposti a pagare i prezzi di iPhone per Android così il motivo per cui Samsung è affetto 3 anni consecutivi di calo dei profitti Se la gente in generale hanno scelto Android per qualcosa di diverso costo Android avrebbe un margine di profitto superiore al iPhone base di utenti non solo più alto, ma non perché il 99 99 degli utenti Android comprare Android per i costi e rendere scuse fino a giustificare il possesso di uno smartphone di 200 nel corso di un 650 si chiederà anche l'FBI che è meglio per garantire la tua privacy un iPhone o un telefono Android Anche se Android costituisce 85 del mercato, iPhone sono sempre al centro, perché i dispositivi Android sono molto più facili da rompere into. You non aveva fatto, solo la tua sensazione che la gente compra solo i telefoni Android, perché si ri presumibilmente cheaper. And i tuoi commenti smentiscono un equivoco fondamentale su come Android riceve gli aggiornamenti iOS gli utenti devono attendere per gli aggiornamenti principali, mentre Android ottiene frequenti aggiornamenti attraverso il gioco Services. Meanwhile, iOS è risultato essere il sistema operativo mobile con il maggior numero di vulnerabilità nel 2015, con quasi 3x come molti come Android Pathetic. The solo una parte veritiera del vostro commento è stata la parte che riguarda gli sviluppatori il resto è puro, non supportato bollocks. Anyone che utilizza 99 99 del verbo sostantivo perché conclusione ingannevole sta parlando direttamente da loro ass. First off ci sono un sacco di fatti per sostenere le persone solo comprare Android causa che ri economico potete guardare la gente media di prezzo pagare per un dispositivo Android 250 rispetto a ciò che la persona media paga per un iPhone 600 potete guardare i profitti di smartphone in cui iPhone costituisce 94 di tutti i profitti globali inferno utenti più Android don t sa nemmeno la marca di telefono hanno solo l'azienda che lo rende posso anche andare a sottolineare che la maggior parte degli utenti Android che possiedono telefoni Android di bilancio, tendono a lasciare Android per iPhone del momento essi sono l'aggiornamento a un dispositivo di punta, questo è un dato di fatto, come well. Secondly si ri aggiornamenti del servizio di confusione con gli aggiornamenti attuali del sistema operativo di Google Play aggiornamento Store non conta come un aggiornamento del sistema operativo sia Android e iOS ottenere un aggiornamento importante ogni anno si dà il succede solo 10 degli utenti Android arriva a vedere che importante aggiornamento prima del prossimo importante uno viene rilasciato mentre il 75 -80 di utenti iOS finiscono sul più recente sistema operativo anche Google ha iniziato aggiornamenti fix mensile di bug che non è anche un aggiornamento importante, dopo che Apple ha fatto per anni con la iPhone. While iOS avevano più vulnerabilità di Android, Android ha avuto quelle di gran lunga più importanti vulnerabilità critiche sono ciò che sono utilizzati da hacker critico Alcune vulnerabilità e malware sono i maggiori problemi in materia di sicurezza e di qualsiasi ricercatore di sicurezza vi direbbe la stessa cosa ma capisco nessuna di queste cose favorire vostro argomento e che si doveva correre attraverso tutti i cattivi articoli contro Android e cercare qualcosa di favorire Android che può anche portare in su che Google s proprio la gente ha detto Android wasn t progettato per essere sicuro e ancora si trova oggi che i dispositivi Android sono ancora molto più facile da hackerare di iPhones. The fatto è che so di più su Android e iOS di te che s che cosa è davvero triste che sei un utente Android, ma so di più su Android di te so anche come sradicare Android, Android e Flash scommetto non avete idea di come fare uno di questi cose. Quando è stata l'ultima volta che il Google Play Store è stato violato e più di 85 applicazioni principali sono stati infettati con il malware perché la risposta non è mai Apple può t dicono che il 21 settembre 2015.And questa discussione sta parlando di dispositivo di punta di Samsung, non un 200 prepagata Android Samsung La ditta che produce la metà dei componenti interni del vostro amato iPhone perché Apple non è altro che un metodo molto efficace di progettazione company. Let di marketing s anche sfatare questa cosa sicurezza L'iPhone 6 è stato jailbroken entro 48 ore dal lancio Il Samsung S5 5 ancora non ha avuto accesso a livello di root violato senza inciampare Knox ci sono attualmente una taglia di 50.000 reclamati su x-dev per chi può farlo il livello di sicurezza su un Samsung di punta è lo stesso di iPhone Pensare altrimenti è pura fanboy. Let me capire bene in testa questo incidente in cui 85 applicazioni totali sono stati infettati è peggio di Android che compongono 90 di tutto il malware mobile ho ll scomposizione di più la in un incidente ed è coinvolgere sviluppatori legit utilizzando uno strumento di terze parti canaglia perché quello ufficiale era troppo lento per scaricare Quindi, in pratica queste applicazioni erano normalmente applicazioni legittime di sviluppatori di fiducia Android ottiene 20-40 rogue apps un mese nel Play Store non applicazioni legittime che ha ottenuto compromessa, applicazioni canaglia puri che sono autorizzati a causa di Google s approvare tutte le politiche Ora mi dicono che è peggio 85 applicazioni legittime infetti che vengono puliti e sono tornate alla normalità o che hanno applicazioni canaglia che continuano a essere rilasciato e Google mantengono l'approvazione li tale diritto s quelli canaglia sono peggiori Questo è il motivo per Android rende il 90 di tutti i malware mobile, anche se si include che l'85 app incidente Google stessa proprio di recente tirato 40 applicazioni canaglia e prima che altri 20 quelli di modo che è 60 proprio lì e nessuno era applicazioni legittime che hanno ottenuto compromised. As per il vostro argomento della sicurezza di Android è sempre stato più difficile da sradicare di iOS è stato quello di jailbreak, questo è risaputo E 's anche la conoscenza comune che Android è molto più facile da hackerare di iOS è così utilizzando il tifo vs jailbreaking per determinare la sicurezza doesn t funziona davvero Soprattutto perché Android è più vulnerabile, fuori dalla scatola di iOS è che si don t nemmeno bisogno di radicare Android per incidere Così radicamento isn t anche la sicurezza needed. Please Knox è superiore a iOS E 'per questo Samsung Knox dispositivi sono stati il secondo posto alle spalle di BlackBerry per essere approvato per Dipartimento della difesa e del Dipartimento di giustizia utilizzare Si utilizza magazzino Android come il tuo bastone di misurazione io sto parlando di Samsung e Knox Knox iOS. Second, Google non dispone di un approvato tutte le politiche che s semplicemente e 's sbagliato una piattaforma dev aperta, ma le applicazioni nel Play Store vengono analizzati alla ricerca di virus, malware e spyware prima che siano released. When si parla di 90, prima, questo non è vero e' s molto più basso e si ri prendendo Android e a livello globale, dove Android ha una quota di mercato molto più grande quindi ovviamente avrà più incidenti Soprattutto con aziende come Heuiwei guadagnando quote di mercato ma serrature Samsung che verso il basso con Knox. We sai di voler spegnere il tema di iOS vs Android e concentrarsi su Knox vs iOS perché Android vs iOS doesn t favorire il vostro lato Knox isn t un sistema operativo in modo da poter t realmente confrontarlo con un sistema operativo anche solo perché il Dipartimento della Difesa approva doesn t renderlo più sicuro si vedrà molti più membri del Congresso con iPhone che con telefoni Knox Hmmm perché è che anche se i telefoni Knox sono molto più sicuro how arrivano quando si tratta di battaglie di crittografia e sicurezza si ri mai menzionati Android ha una maggiore quota di mercato globale destra Se Knox era più sicuro di iOS poi Android e Knox sarebbero messi sotto il fuoco da parte del governo di iOS destra Allora perché isn t esso Google s scansione di virus non è diverso da Apple dover approvare tutte le applicazioni che vanno in AppStore, la differenza è molto più di malware applicazioni rendono in Play Store anche ora che AppStore così l'efficacia di Google s supposta AV è discutibile quanto riguarda il tuo parlare di malware stesso Se ci si concentra solo su di noi, quindi è possibile rimuovere i 85 iOS infetti app dal tuo ragionamento perché colpiti solo cinese Android users. LMFAO sui membri del Congresso commento Quei ragazzi sono più grandi idioti tecnici del pianeta io sto parlando del Dipartimento della Difesa e DoJ e si mettono in una rappresentazione vecchio 80 anni dal Podunk come misurazione stick. You allevato perché qualcuno dovrebbe pagare un premio a chiunque Android, quando si potrebbe ottenere un iPhone in the middle of a Samsung discussion My bad I thought you wanted an answer I fully understand why you d want to steer away from Knox and focus on the great, unwashed Android masses But the fact remains that Knox is integrated in to the OS in Samsung flagship devices Knox is more secure than iOS Period Samsung s hardware is better, the OS is more dynamic and Knox makes it more secure. You can toss Android vs iOS babble around all you want But Samsung is at the forefront of technical innovation right now Apple makes a nice phone, no doubt But that superiority complex of yours is wholly unwarranted. If you had watched the congress hearing over security, you wouldn t have made the comment about the DoD and DoJ vs congressmen A lot of congressmen have worked in the tech field before becoming congressmen, they have far more expertise in tech security than the DoJ and DoD Matter of fact if you look at most attacks on tech security the DoD and DoJ pay someone else to do the attacks for them, they don t do them themselves Hell they can t even figure out how to open an iPhone 5c without Apple s help They know almost nothing about tech security when it comes to using it to protect the people or finding information, they pay hackers or try to force the companies themselves to do it instead Samsung hardware is again only better because Android is a slower OS, it s been proven time and again But keep trying to convince yourself that specs matter more than actual performance In the end you will need to have someone who knows how to do tech attacks not hire others to do it for them, when you re gonna use them as judge of what is secure and what isn t If they can t destroy security on mobile devices themselves, they re the last people I would use their opinion when it comes to what is secure. Ahhhaaaaahaha Yes Congress is chock full of tech geniuses Keep telling yourself that And what does hacking ability have to do with security standards The NSA advises the DoD on security standards and helps set them They adopted Knox before iOS because of how secure Knox is That was the point Jeez Try to keep up. Let me break down all the advantages iOS has over Android Security, Privacy, Quality of Apps Games and performance stability. Maybe on Android devices in general, but not vs Samsung Samsung is more secure with Knox The Knox container gives you absolute privacy Quality of apps Maybe at one time and in some niche markets like music development However, companies no longer develop strictly for iOS or even exclusively target iOS The majority of people own Android devices The app developers spend just as much time in on Android as iOS. We ve already covered performance Apple is playing catch up and has been since the iPhone 4S The only thing you can hang your hat on is profitability That because iSheep will flock to anything with that half eaten fruit on it Look at the Apple watch Crap battery life, not water resistant, ugly as hell yet sells millions But hey, it looks great with your Uggs and half caff latte. Like I said it s obvious you didn t watch hearing You also didn t read about how the DoD DoJ paid for a DDoS attack on Tor You don t follow along with anything The NSA also couldn t break into the iPhone 5c So much for their standards too Did it ever occur to you they want people with Android in general because it s easier to break into and they know most will associate Knox with Android Of course not But the fact is the government seems to think the iPhone is more secure than ANY android device, since it s mentioned more than Knox and Android when it comes to encryption and security, and you can t dispute it because it sa fact So many articles back it up. You also need to go back to benchmarks when looking at performance The iPhone 6s blew away the S6 in overall benchmarks, the iPhone 6 and iPhone 6s beat the S6 in gaming benchmarks and the iPhone 5s, 6 and iPhone 6s beat the S6 in browsing benchmarks So tell me where is this actual performance advantage of Android devices you speak of It s not showing in benchmark tests, it s not showing in stability tests either So what standard do you use to judge performance Personal opinion you wish to take as fact. I m glad you have such in depth knowledge of my background I followed the Silk Road case with that nut DPR And what those guys S waist6 the FBI and NSA did was nothing short of amazing Of course it required luck and a great deal of time But tracking a guy down who was using such great measures to conceal himself is amazing It also has absolutely NOTHING to do with what we re talking about Those same guys eventually recommended approval of iOS We re they still incompetent Of course not. The reason criminals prefer iOS is that most criminals are stupid So they choose Apple devices because they re aware of the PERCEIVED security advantage So more criminals use iOS Congratulations The fact that they aren t aware of Knox doesn t make Knox less secure You re equating popularity with better The Honda Accord is the most stolen car in the US So it s the best, right No It s just the most popular. I ll let the Geekbench test tell they performance tale. First off it s funny how you wouldn t show how the S6 did compared to the 6s because you know the 6s is faster you instead went to the Note 5 which is newer than the 6s Didn t like the result the Galaxy S6 had did you As for security The FBI case vs Apple and this on going fight for encryption has went on since 2014 and Android is always a side note, you rarely hear Knox mentioned in any of that either When it comes to encryption and security even the government ALL branches mention iOS more than Knox and Android You hate that I know So you re gonna make excuses to justify it The reality is whether Knox is more secure than iOS for the people or not doesn t matter if the government itself has a way through it Sounds to me like Samsung gave the government the ability to disable Knox Be happy that Android companies are more willing to make their devices more vulnerable for the government thus also making them more vulnerable to hackers and other governments. Why would I show the S6 vs the 6S The Note and the 6S are on the same release cycle If you really want to be unfair we could show the S7 vs the 6S. So wait, you re saying that Samsung gave the government a side door in to Knox LMAO Don t hurt your self making those ridiculous leaps in logic Full release Knox has never been breached Ever You can connect whatever ludicrous dots you see under your tin hat, but Knox is Enterprise software Samsung is never going to open a back door in business software. So now we go all the way back to your idiotic initial assertion question about why anyone would buy an Android, specifically a Samsung, when they could buy an iPhone Simple It s easily just as good if not better in almost every appreciable way Better screen, better battery life, better camera, expandable memory, water resistant That s why. First off both the S6 and 6s were released in 2015 so they are in fair comparison Matter of fact the comparison should be the S6 vs 6s and the Note 5 vs 6s Plus but you don t want to compare the S6 vs the 6s because you know the S6 got smoked by the 6s in benchmarks That is the only reason you don t want to compare the 2 Admit it you looked up benchmarks, saw the 6s beat the S6 and then saw the Note 5 beat the iPhone 6s and chose to use the Note 5 instead Just admit it. All I have to do is continue stating the fact that almost no one mentioned Knox when talking about security when it comes to security researchers or the government It s always about iPhones There are far more Android phones out there and I m sure there s plenty of Galaxies that the government have gotten ahold of, but seems like only the iPhones are they having issues with Why is that. My very first post never once said why would anyone buy Android, I asked why would anyone pay the same for bloatware as they would for an iPhone that doesn t There are Android devices that don t come with bloatware with as good or better features specs as the S7 So why choose the S7 over another Android device of same specs features but less or no bloatware Because of the Samsung name right Makes it worth putting up with that bloatware. The iPhone 6S and the Note5 were released within a month of each other The Note5 and the S6 have the same processor The only major difference is the RAM I don t need to look up this stuff I work in the industry and know it like the back of my hand You sound like a child babbling on about admit it The point is that Samsung makes hardware and software every bit as capable as the iPhone. You make pompous claims about peerless security and are shown wrong Now you re bringing up some ridiculous anecdotal crap about who talks the most about which device as if that somehow correlates in to something significant If iOS is so secure, how come Samsung was approved before it The answer is that Knox is every bit as secure The fact that your imaginary experts aren t talking about it what does that even mean, anyway is totally irrelevant. But your original statement about bloatware is still just as douchy and stupid as the rest of your arguments If you buy a carrier iPhone, it has the carrier bloat on it Same with Samsung, HTC, LG, etc If you buy the unlocked version of the S6, it s just as bloat free as the non carrier version of the iPhone. Keep making up excuses that the S6 with better specs got destroyed in benchmarks by the iPhone 6s What s you re excuse it lost to the iPhone 6 in gaming benchmarks since it is newer than the iPhone 6 And please share your justification as to why the S6 is slower on browsing benchmarks to the iPhone 5s which is even older. Also the fact the iPhone is mentioned more and been proven to cause the government more issues to break into trumps any claims by the DoD that Knox is more secure The government has never been frustrated getting into an Android device whether it be an Galaxy with Knox or just Android itself Let me know when the government s actions with Knox match their claims. Oh but the iPhone doesn t come with carrier bloatware The fact you think it does shows you have never owned an iPhone I bought my iPhone from Sprint itself, not one piece of carrierware was on it This is what I mean about Android users, they have never owned an iDevice yet for some reason they think they can judge iOS based on their zero knowledge of iOS Here s facts for you based on a guy who has had both iOS and Android and from others who have actually had both not just claim it iOS is a faster OS, that s not even disputable The proof that the 6s with less specs killed the S6 in benchmarks shows that Android is less stable Android phones freezes, slowdown and reboot more often than iPhones there s even stats to back that up too The quality of apps games on iOS are also superior to the Android versions developers care more about iOS than Android thus build their apps games on iOS and port them to Android These are actual facts Matter of fact most iPhone users who switch to Android, don t stay with Android because of those things I just mentioned But I rarely see someone who has left Android for iOS go back to Android Plus if iOS users really want Android features and openness we can just jailbreak, which for the record has better tweaks than what rooted Android offers Also still more secure than most Android devices as well I personally don t need the openness of Android since I don t mind spending money on apps games I am waiting for some form of physical proof by security researchers or the government to show Knox is stronger than iOS not just a claim with no actual evidence. Oye You re exhaustively simple minded The S6 does not get destroyed by the 6S The link I posted shows the Note5 result on par with the 6S That s the same processor in the Note5 as the S6 So I m not sure where you see this destroyed thing Unless you re eating up the Boy Genius slop Then that would explain a bunch BTW, that same link shows the S7 processor mauling the 6S THAT is what destruction looks like. The fact that Apple is currently involved with a high profile battle with the FBI has zero to do with the level of security in a Samsung They both use AES 256-bit ODE encryption, so how is Apple more secure. I m guilty as charged The last iPhone I owned was the iPhone 4 Company paid so I used it I thought for SURE it had carrier crap on it But apparently I m wrong That also has nothing to do with your claim that the iPhone is better Carrier subsidized Samsung has carrier bloat that s easily removed The unlocked version has none of it. I also showed you actual Geekbench 3 results Not some blowhard opinion, but actual results Where is this superiority you speak of. Stability Try again Here s the actual facts from the last conclusive tests Apparently, iOS 8 crashes slightly more often than Lollipop, having a 2 2 crash rate compared to Android 5 s 2 0 rate iOS 8 also loses when compared to the previous release iOS 7 had a 1 9 crash rate , while Lollipop beats bot KitKat and Ice Cream Sandwich, each having 2 6 crash rates That s from BGR, a notorious Apple fanboy site. So there s your actual facts Not innuendo, not suppositions, but actual facts Sorry You lose Samsung is every bit as capable as iPhone And you don t have to have a Napoleon complex to own one. Again you can t find hard evidence to state your case that Knox is more secure outside of XDA bounty and a claim from the DoD Even though the phones that the FBI are having a hard time breaking into are not Galaxy phones Also the fact the XDA bounty was only 50,000 compared to the iOS one that was a million bounty should tell you the security level difference 50,000 Knox bounty, 1,000,000 iOS bounty hmmm. Weird this says Android devices make up for 85 of all smartphone crashes and it s from this year. Don t know if you hate Android or what but here are my thoughts and I m sure some Android users would agree on. Price is a huge factor if I can get 80-90 of the functionality of a flagship phone for half the price why not Pretty easy decision for those looking for maximum value. Don t get me wrong, I don t hate Apple I own an iPad air 2 Why Because it was cheaper The only other comparable Android tablet of the same size at the time was the xperia z tablets and it was like 5-600 So yeah price is a huge factor especially since the functionality is pretty much the same between the two OS. A lot of the Android fans probably have not used ios devices in past few years I know ios has improved a lot because I own a device, but ios was pretty bad until like ios 7 could be 6, can t remember Prior to that the OS multitasking wasn t even a thing on ios so Android was seen as the more powerful OS Now they re pretty even in terms of software capabilities. Now for a phone I chose Android If I could get a device that was cheaper and provide a more fun experience, why not I say more fun because I personally love how I can tweak much more than ios Even small things like animations I can also customize it much more Make it more personal The only way iphones look personalized is the case if you use one and the wallpapers With Android you can customize much more launchers, widgets, Roms, app drawer, etc Oh and you can change the ROM Sometimes you get bored, flash a new ROM and the fun starts all over again. Customization doesn t end in software There are hundreds or thousands of Android phones for you to choose from Each with their own design and hardware You don t have to choose from two sizes. It sa sacrifice that s worth making for many of us More security issues or what not Google is providing monthly security updates now and Samsung has knox not sure how effective it is I personally havent had any issues OS updates are an issue Some manufacturers may start to move to off contract , off carrier sales like moto and roll out faster updates Having updates to go through carriers is such pain I also agree on the bloatware issue I personally go for the near stock phones like moto, nexus, or flash cyanogen. Also they re huge Dangerous 94 of market profit Their moves can have massive impact in tech industry I don t like that One call from Tim Cook and I would need to use an adapter to plug in my 3 5mm headphones for the 7 If they make that move I will hate them forever companies will follow because of their massive influence. I actually don t have an issue with Android itself Matter of fact my initial post was more a question about just one smartphone I actually had an Android phone before I had an iPhone I had a Motorola Cliq which came out before the first Droid phone The reason I left Android is because I could not see a reason to pay a premium price to get less performance My iPod Touch 2G got more updates than my Cliq even though it was older Games ran smoother on my iPod Touch than my Cliq as well There s just something wrong when an older device runs better and does better with games than a newer device I actually got a Kindle Fire 5G, and it s so much slower than my iPhone 6 Plus, I actually haven t used it in over a month As for profit Android companies have themselves to blame for this They try to put their flagship devices in a price range most Android users just aren t willing to pay And flagship devices are where companies make their money Samsung could double their smartphone profits by selling their S7 for 450 as it would not only get some budget users to choose their flagship instead but also may get some iPhone users to go with Android to save money But Samsung is determined to sell Android at iPhone prices, and it s just not gonna work As for the headphones thing I don t mind needing an adapter for my Bose headphones IF it means better quality internal speakers And rumor is they will use that extra space to add another speaker so that might be a good compromise. So your two points of reference in comparing the Apple and Android ecosystems are a phone from 6 years ago before Android even began to become popular and a recent Android tablet that you re comparing to an apple product that cost about six times as much. And now your premise is that the galaxy s7 and edge offer less performance than the iPhone offerings. Your original question was fine and the answer is because the other features of the phone outweigh the negative of the bloatware for the people who choose to purchase it I hate Touchwiz but this offering from Samsung ticked enough other boxes that I chose to buy it despite that. I think that the premise that Android flagship phones offer less performance than iPhones is false I can understand why people would value some features more than others and in that regard, that is no wrong choice but to argue that performance is flat out worse in all aspects just seems incredibly closed-minded. If you don t believe me about performance Look at how the iPhone 6 did against the S6 in gaming benchmarks The S6 is newer than the iPhone 6 yet it got smoked on gaming benchmarks Also The S6 lost to the 6s in normal benchmarks And even the iPhone 5s beat the S6 when it came browsing benchmarks So what do you go by to determine performance if those things don t I also know the iPhone 7 will beat the Galaxy S7 in benchmarks because the newest iPhone beats the Galaxy every single year. We weren t talking about the S6, we were talking about the S7.You re defining performance as one very specific area I m talking about everything upon which a phone can be measured Processor, camera, storage, OS features, other hardware features, screen size etc And benchmarks don t really matter to me if the end experience is nearly identical The camera on the S7 is better The processor is faster There s more RAM It has removable storage Samsung pay works with regular swipe card readers These are all areas in which the S7 arguably surpasses the iPhone There are other areas and considerations where the iPhone surpasses the S7 and when the new iPhone is released in many months, it will probably perform better But right now, to claim that the current crop of iPhones perform better than the S7 in all areas is really just disingenuous. Yes, the next iPhone will probably surpass the S7 in some or most or even all of these areas but that s several months of tech development later and then the next iteration of the Galaxy will be several months of development after that and they continue to leapfrog each other. At this point, it doesn t sound like you re asking an honest question if you re incapable of believing anyone s response Why are you even posting to this forum if you refuse to accept or acknowledge people s answers to your questions. Processor and RAM only matter if it makes the phone faster and more stable Do you realize the S5 had better specs than the iPhone 6s yet wasnt faster or as stable As for the Camera argument, Android users used to act like the camera didn t matter because their excuse when the iPhone camera was better is people who care about picture quality use an actual camera not a phone Now all the sudden cameras in phones matter When the iPhone ends up with better picture quality rest assured Android users will go back to picture quality on a camera doesn t matter And I believe answers from people who have used both iOS and Android not ones who give their opinion from one side and act like Android is better cause of it I ve owned both Android and iOS so I know both sides I also follow benchmarks and all articles involving iOS, Android and Windows mobile because it s plain dumb to focus only on one aspect or one OS. Owning and using an Android phone from 6 years ago and a tablet that you compare to another device that costs over 6 times as much doesn t sound like knowing both sides very well But that aside, in a discussion about the Galaxy S7, a new device, why do you insist on talking about other devices that are one or two generations old You re talking and asking about the S7 but continually keep bringing up the S5 and S6 as examples of phones that weren t as good They probably weren t The S6 was a step down as far as I m concerned and Touchwiz on the S5 lagged terribly which is why I wasn t interested in them The S7 from all reviews doesn t seem to have any of those problems, brought back the features from the S5 that were removed, improved on them and added several new ones. And you don t believe that there sa single feature on the S7 that is better than the iPhones currently available SD card Samsung pay Several other people do and they ve explained as such If you simply don t believe them then there s no further reason to continue You re not going to convince them and you seem unable to accept that this might be a device that performs better in some, or even many aspects that an iPhone that s six months old Personally, I believe that the camera is not only better but much better Several review sites put the cameras on the current crop of flagship Android phones at or above the camera on the iPhone 6 The S6 edge is pretty consistently rated at or above the iPhone 6s and the camera on the S7 looks way better Samsung has a pretty good history making some of the best cameras available on phones and the includes iPhones Maybe the next iPhone will have an even better camera It s entirely possible But I m willing to bet that the camera on the S7 is better, particularly in low light, than that of the iPhone 6s. As far as cameras not mattering, there sa saying among photographers The best camera to use is the one that s with you At this point, camera phones outperform point and shoots until you start getting to the 400 price point Yes, I would obviously rather have my SLR with a prime lens of the appropriate focal length attached to take a picture, but it s far more likely that I ll have my phone when any given photo opportunity arises This has been true for years and will likely continue to be true Anyone who says or said differently is wrong. I actually have a Kindle Fire as well But you know the odd thing is most on here while they tell me I should try Android now to compare, they have never once owned an iDevice So they re basically telling iPhone users to try Android without willingness to try iOS, kinda defeats the purpose don t you agree Plus I have mentioned in one of my posts my sis owned an S5 and yes I have used it, it is far slower than my iPhone 6 Plus is especially when it comes to how it handles data in areas of weak coverage. I never said that the S7 didn t have better features than the iPhones currently out I m not sure how you can say Samsung Pay is better than Apple Pay though seeing as Apple Pay is more secure than Samsung Pay is It s also more widely used than Samsung Pay is SD Card I have brought up on multiple occasions that it would be useful IF you could install apps games directly to the SD Card I also know Android 6 allows for this but Samsung decided not to allow that feature in the S7 I honestly think the G series by LG are the best Android phones, Samsung is just an overhyped brand that never actually does as it s expected compared to other top Android flagship brands BTW LG G5 does allow for install on SD card and I will definately take a long hard look over it when it s time to upgrade I almost got a G3 instead of my iPhone 6 Plus It was a real fight for me on that What made me end up choosing the iPhone over the G3 was design and the fact I don t want to risk plopping down 600 for a smartphone that may or may not getting 2 years of updates. And yes photographers say that but Android users only took that seriously when some Android phones surpassed the iPhone in quality That said while the S6 did have better picture quality than the iPhone 6s is wasn t THAT much better that you could say this is so much better Tests have shown in general that the G series actually takes the best pictures No Samsung fanboy wants to go into that conversation though Also if you haven t noticed most photographers still use iPhones as their phone of choice for pictures iPhones are the perferred smartphone of professionals whether it be doctors, photographers or even businesses Hell Donald Trump tells people to boycott Apple products but he still tweets with an iPhone Hell some people at Samsung have tweeted on an iPhone as well as a head of Microsoft and someone at BlackBerry Makes you wonder if they really believe their own products are as good as the iPhone if they re using the iPhone instead of their own phones they create to tweet with. The Kindle Fire is the tablet that I referenced where you compared it to an iPhone 6 I don t know why you insist on arguing what other Android users have said in the past It not really relevant to what either I m saying now or your original questions I do agree that it s hypocritical to say that one side should try the other without being willing to do so onesself but that sa straw man and irrelevant to boot And again with the previous generation of Galaxy phones who cares, they had their issues but the S7 is a different model It d be like me going on about the antennae issues on a previous generation of iPhone It s irrelevant But since you seem to care, I owned a 3rd generation iPod nano and my mom has an iPhone 6s that I provide tech support for so I guess I can say I ve experience on both sides. There isn t much left to say but one thing to note about the SD on the S7 is that even though it s not adaptable storage, you can move apps or at least part of the apps to the SD card That sa pleasant surprise for me though I was happy with the SD just for picture and video. LG does take great pictures and it s really subjective on whether any given LG camera is better than a corresponding Samsung camera They each have situations where they ll take a better picture over the other so it s really up to personal preference I m optimistic that the F1 7 lens combined with the larger pixels on the S7 sensor will take better low light pictures without flash which is something I tend to value more than other aspects Its why I primarily shoot with a 50 1 4 fixed lens on my SLR with no flash If someone else is looking for better resolution in sunny situations, they d probably be better served with a G5.And as I ve pointed out on many of my other comments, moving to SD card is not putting all storage on your SD Card A Kindle Fire I can use as an example 8 GB internal with 256 GD SD does not equal 264 GB of storage unless 90 of your SD card is used for stuff like downloaded music or videos Matter of fact you will be lucky to get 16 GB of stuff onto that SD card before your internal is full and won t let you use your SD card because of it What I m also saying is if you use Gaming Benchmarks or browser Benchmarks, the newer Android devices don t even fair well against older iPhones The Galaxy S6 couldn t even beat out the iPhone 6 in gaming The Galaxy S6 couldn t beat out the 5s in browsing So in some ways older iPhones can out perform newer Android devices Another fx to iPhones is trade in value As for the why I insist on arguing, My very first comment was a question and someone else had to say iOS sux without giving a reason I was merely curious as to why someone would pay 500 or more for a smartphone that has bloatware from carriers when you can buy a device that has no carrierware at the same price like an iPhone I just don t understand paying for ads which is basically what youre doing. You do understand that the Samsung S6 and S7 are technically superior phones to the iPhone 6 and 6S, right Why would they undercut themselves It s the most popular Android device by far and not everyone wants to be led down the Apple cattle shoot. You re basing your Android experience on a phone that s more than 5 years old when Android was in its infancy BTW , look at numbers of who is moving to which device More new Android users are former iOS users than new iOS users are former Android users. You should look at how many former FLAGSHIP smartphone users have moved from iOS to Android and Android to iOS Using total numbers is an excuse since most iOS users who leave for Android usually go with a budget phone because they no longer can afford a flagship one Ask Samsung themselves because they see far more Android users leaving Galaxy for iPhone than the other way around As for your superior argument Do you realize Android devices have to have to have more specs to perform equally to iOS because Android is a more power hungry OS Look at benchmarks The Galaxy S5 had more specs than the iPhone 6 yet the iPhone 6 performed better Hell in gaming benchmarks, the iPhone 6 beat the Galaxy S6 In browsing benchmarks even the iPhone 5s beat the Galaxy S6.Don t know if you hate Android or what I m not a hater of Android, I actually had an Android phone before my first iPhone I just hate Android users who insult things without giving a reason why. Price is a huge factor if I can get 80-90 of the functionality of a flagship phone for half the price why not I have no issue with people choose devices based on price I have issues with people who choose devices based on price then go after those who have more expensive devices. Also they re huge Dangerous 94 of market profit Apple s influence in general is a good thing as they are pushing for security for the people The headphone adapter I can live with if it means better sounding internal speakers like rumors are going around. Whose security is better Samsung Knox or iOS. The problem with all this is Android users who use Knox tend to go strictly by rooting vs jailbreaking as the determination of security Even though Android has always been harder to root than iOS has been to jailbreak yet Android is easier to hack than iOS, Android users still rely on jailbreaking vs rooting Also most Android users assume that Knox and Google protect them so they don t use top notch AntiVirus They assume Knox and Google do all the work Google may scan for malware but it doesn t remove all malware Knox has zero AntiVirus built into it, absolutely none So answer your question, I would still lean toward iOS because Android users have not given any evidence Knox is more secure outside of jailbreaking and rooting for their argument with security I don t see any reports that show a lower percent of Knox devices are hacked or have a lower percent of malware Until there are actual security reports to back these claims up they re only claims. Of the devices I ve owned that were rootable, I ve rooted every one. Here s the thing some Android devices never get root, and many more take months before a suitable exploit is found My Droid Turbo, for example, didn t see root until a year after release. By contrast, new versions of iOS are jailbroken WITHIN HOURS of release. Nothing else needs to be said here. I can afford the iphone maybe just 16 and 64 gb but I chose not to get one because I find it boring and lacking features and i admit I personally don t like the hype and popularity surrounding it Sure it sa great phone and very straightforward, effective, and simplistic, but I prefer android. I ve never dealt with security issues or malware. IMO, My s5 is way better than the iPhone 6s in terms of features Sure the iphone beats it in certain categories, but I get sdcard, removable battery, water resistance, an amazing amoled screen, lots of little features like multiwindow, customization without having to root, widgets, and maybe more. To each his own though. S6 did away with the removable battery and the S7 continues that Removable battery is a nice feature to have except for most people, you re gonna upgrade before you need a new battery so in most cases the removable battery is more a gimmick The SD card would be useful if you could install apps games to the SD card not just move them to the SD Card The biggest issue with the S5 is how it handle data in areas with spotty service My sis has an S5 and we went on a trip together to a place where our service just isn t good We both have Sprint Anyways my iPhone 6 Plus had signal far more often than she did She actually kept asking me to look things up because her phone always had no LTE or even 3G, it was out of service most of the time. You compleyely ignore the fact that you can put hundreds of gigs of media on multiple SD cards and swap them out You can carry a terabyte on just 5 cards Can t do that with an iPhone. Because that excuse doesn t work anymore Most people now stream music and movies thus making the media SD Card argument a moot point You re prolly one of those guys who illegally downloads things and stores it onto an SD Card because you either can t afford to pay for anything or are too cheap to pay for anything. I don t believe that at all I don t know anyone who streams movies on their data plan Not at 15 a gig once you go over your cap. Hahaha did you just make up those number off the top of your head Like you know there are EXACTLY 85 more bugs in Android devices That sounds like terrorist-protector Cook saying that so many iphones are being bought by people switching from Android yet somehow Apple iphone shipments declined the last quarter and Android still has a commanding market share Something doesn t add up, Mr Cook Keep saying that Android users can t afford iphones It won t make your small dick any bigger While Android caters to all price levels, there are plenty of Android users who pay just as much for their flagship Samsungs, LG s, HTC s, Sony s, Motorola s, etc I wouldn t use that toy OS if I was given an iphone for free I m glad Apple finally figured out that if I opened up a link from an email that I might want to go back to the email app after reading the link without having to double tap the home button and switch back to it Who thought it was a great idea to have the back button in Safari on the bottom but on the top of virtually every other system app setting Thank god Android has a back button Anyway, go back to your elite phone that only 15 of people can afford Maybe one day you ll be as elite as Windows Phone and be part of the 1.Well if you actually looked things up you would know my numbers may be a percent or so off but they are facts The fact you commented without looking says everything That s the issue with Android users, they respond without looking anything up. I find it odd that you KNOW Robert didn t look up any of your facts Perhaps he did, and he could not substantiate them it appears he replied 2 hours after your comment so I just started with googling android bugs to ios and the first 5 hits are all about how ios9 could be pushing iphone users to android because it s so buggy I admit, I skimmed the articles because I am just looking for some references to the bug you stated And, I have not yet changed my search criteria, but I am still looking You could make it easier by perhaps posting the sources I d be interested to read them, especially on the bug count, of course. Android accounts for 85 of all device failures. Thanks, I ll have to download the Blannco report, because BGRs coverage is missing some details Others citing the report lead with the fact that 75 of the issues are not actual hardware or software problems, but user issues such as apps running in the background, batteries damaged from unnecessary charging, etc PC Mag cites The Blancco study analyzed an unknown number of smartphones and tablets that underwent diagnostics testing on the SmartChk platform but another article cites millions Both troubling if Blannco did not break down the study group Questions arise such as, how many devices were tested was it indeed millions or at least significant , was the study group balanced, or did it reflect market share, etc I m also having trouble finding the app itself on google play it was on itunes , so I m not sure how they are getting their android stats unless certain carriers are using the app in store for diagnostics. Their own site does show it does offer their service on both Android and iOS But they don t list a download link on the site for either So I m not sure if you have to have them do the diagnostic test which if that is the case, I can see carriers using on returned phones that need repairs I can also see it used by services like Gazelle who buy them used then resell them It doesn t sound like they go back actual users opinions Which is good because users themselves actually complain about smallest things iOS users for instance will complain merely about a change even if it has zero affect on performance If it s something they don t like they complain They have a right to though because they spent 600 or more on their smartphone When you spend that kinda money you expect more for your money than someone who spends 200 Do you know one of the biggest reasons those who switch from Android to iOS miss most Quality of Apps and Games They love the features of Android but they tend to have a hard time looking past the apps games thing The second thing I hear mentioned is the performance like how frequently their Android device freezes compared to how often their iPhone did. Ok, got the report, and it does not include any more information that would address concerns with their survey They do not cite how the survey group is broken down, how or if the survey size was normalized for market or user share the data came from their SmartChk app They mention the study group was gathered from millions of devices, but again, no breakdown or grouping details They state that 75 of all issues are user issues not the actual device or software , yet they do not state whether their claim of 85 android 15 iOs represents the remaining 25 that could be categorized as real issues Their approach on this study appears to be a sales piece, so you can see the correlations to how they would pitch their product They even give suggestions on resolving some of the top issues, such as battery over-charging Quote Stop over-charging the battery Users tend to excessively charge smartphones and tablets more than necessary This tends to reduce the battery s shelf life Users must remember that the battery is designed to work for 500 full charging cycles full charging cycle means it has charged from zero percent to 100 percent Instead, a device should only be charged if there is 25 percent battery power left on it Their suggestion is not relevant to the problem because if you only use say 10 of your battery each day, you do not use a full charging cycle for 10 days assuming lithium based batteries, of course Needless to say, I would question the validity of their survey without some responses to these call outs. I don t need to look it up because I can spot BS when I read it Why waste my time looking up something that doesn t exist I ve already wasted enough time replying to your ignorant post Since you were the one who made the claim, it s your responsibility to supply your reference or just admit you made it up Breaking news Apple and Tim Cook protect 100 more terrorists than Google Look it up I read it on the internet so it must be true. The fact you wouldn t bother looking it up says everything You are a typical Android user purely opinionated with no facts and no willingness to look things up before commenting Also I guess you weren t aware of Google backing Apple in this FBI vs Apple case So I guess they support terrorism just as much as Apple they just don t know how to make an OS as secure as iOS You re prolly also not aware that Samsung spoke out about it too and sides with Apple Wow everyone supports Apple except the people who don t follow along and just form an opinion instantly It s all these others who stated facts on here about Android, I didn t force them to confirm it, I looked up what they said to validate it You won t because you want to believe what you want and even I did post the link you would say it was a lie because you want to believe your own way which has been obvious. Seriously dude, there s no point in looking up your numbers because they are all made up in that fantasy that takes place in your brain Just like all those numbers that you spout out on every Android article on Softpedia I don t know how you have time to even use your easily hackable iphone with all the time you spend trolling Android news sites Do you seriously think I m going to take anything you say seriously when you say things like 99 99 of Android users buy Android for cost and make excuses up to justify owning a 200 smartphone over a 650 one That stat sounds totally legit As far as the FBI vs Apple case, I know all about it I support the FBI s request for Apple to hack the PARTICULAR phone that was owned by a KNOWN TERRORIST AND KILLER if they are able to do so I don t support any request to create a universal backdoor that can be used at any time Answer this question If a member of your family was kidnapped and the kidnapper dropped their locked iphone and the police found it and wanted Apple to hack into it to see if it would help located your missing loved on, would you support or be against that Would you just say Oh well, I value the concept of privacy too much to ask Apple to do such a thing Fortunately, since iphones have been exposed now as easily hackable, it wouldn t be a problem or moral dilemma for you Apple OWNED. Matt you need to get your facts straight Android is much more stable than iPhone and apparently the camera on Android is better too. I move apps to my SD card on my Galaxy S5, but it doesn t help with the storage issue My photos still show up as using phone memory, unless I pull the card out and most apps still use some of your phones memory, even after being put on the SD card It is also a pain in the A to move every app you download I still love my Galaxy and plan to get the 7 edge, but I wanted to clear up the misconception of you truly having more storage. Something must be wonky here I have a 16GB S5 with 9GB of pictures on a microSD card and those photos aren t affecting my internal phone storage at all I have over 9 GB of app and system data alone on the internal storage Cache data and miscellaneous files use another 4GB Still have over 3GB free Bottom line, external pictures shouldn t also use internal memory. Not satisfied because SD storage is slower and concessions shouldn t have to be made for that expensive of a device, especially when there s an option readily available built into the OS that was disabled by the manufacturer Not acceptable. If the option you are referring to is the adoptable storage I don t think that makes anything faster It would still be restricted by the speed of the sd storage. Thanks for this post It helped me to decide tonight to cancel the order for the 32 GB Galaxy S7 Edge and just hold out for the 64 GB version, that I m sure will be available in a few months Silly that they didn t offer it out of the gate. Can someone tell me if the 200 gb SD card for sale on Amazon will work for 4K video or just 1080p on down. I highly doubt it moves the bulk of the big apps to SD card It probably moves the apk, dex, and lib files to SD only which has been native in android the Kit Kat way forever But the internal app data and obb files which is where 90 of big games data lives, has to stay on the data partition unless you symlink to an SD card partition with same format Read about how link2SD app on play store works to understand what the Android 6 0 merging of SD card and internal storage is based on that the S7 has disabled in its fork of Android. Yeah, that sa pretty good thing actually Good for them to implement To be fair, Android by itself does take up a bit more space in Marshmallow On my Nexus 6, I can t push a new edit onto the phone without moving some apps out of the System folder on the new Marshmallow builds The reasoning is that the System partition has gotten a bit too full So add Marshmallow bloat to another UI layer, surprise. I thought every phone did this lol. Because my computer is for work and skyrim with 4k textures, my phone is for angry birds and making phone calls There is no realistic advantage to having fast storage in a phone, at least for me. You just proved my point though You re using an SSD for increased performance, just like I am I can t put my OS on a mechanical HDD anymore because it s unbearably slow, even in RAID0.You do want faster NAND flash Once you upgrade, you ll know what I mean when you try to use your M8 again Everything takes longer Obviously, apps that stay in RAM run at the speed of RAM, so no improvement will be seen It s when apps are loaded into RAM, updated in the Play Store, when reading writing large data files game data, large videos, etc , and loading heavy websites, that you ll begin to notice. By the time SD cards of today start to feel slow, then we will have new soc s that support the fast SD cards Again, ssd s sport much larger performance gains compared to hdd s than flash does to sd cards, at least in my experience If you feel like paying 200 for minimal amounts of storage on your phone be my guest I ll gladly spend that on a ssd, but not for my phone. Also, a ssd in a computer is far more noticeable in terms of performance than fast flash storage is in a phone, I know this because my iPhone 6s didn t really feel faster despite having the fastest flash speed available on the market compared to my m8.Except you had a Galaxy S6 and OOPS No SD Card Genius Samsung, genius. This is not reply to above, as much as reply to article. This we can move app to SD is not true for many large apps and games, practically all that download lot of data after first start Those apps store their own data on internal Android obb or Android data, and those hundreds of MB per app do NOT move to external SD when you use move app So you end up with moving only small part of such app to external SD. Unless they changed how they do that on S7 which I doubt , ability to move apps to external SD will NOT always save you enough space. You are totally right I have galaxy s7 edge, and when I tried to transfer game which size is about 2GB it transfered just several hundreds MB Would be much better to have bigger internal memory than putting micro sd which no have no point of moving programs Why they can t create clean full transferring. If Samsung offers 64GB or even 128GB I would not hesitate to choose Galaxy S7 Edge over Nexus 6P Having an option of expandable microSD with only 32GB internal storage is useless since you will have a lot of technical issues when you move apps to microSD. I am currently using 128GB Nexus 6P I insert 200GB microSD into USB-C microSD adapter and connect it into my Nexus 6P for movie, music and photos 128GB internal 9and 200GB extra external to use work so beautifully for me. Until Samsung releases 64GB or even 128GB internal, I will stay with Nexus 6P or 7 that will be released this year. The only thing I hate about Nexus 6P is fingerprint sensor on the back. Indeed and they should acquire a cheaper phone but the beauty is tmobile jump on demand can put these expensive computers in the hands of more people without breaking the bank. Isn t this just one of the marshmallow features At least I thought I remembered reading something about this, in addition to adoptable storage. I ma bit confused too From what I gather , moving apps to SD for portable storage is no longer a native Android feature and has been superseded by adoptable storage, which isn t mandatory for 3rd party OEMs. Therefore it s up to the OEM to decide whether then want to implement Portable storage with Apps2SD as Samsung has done Portable storage without Apps2SD worst case scenario, not sure who does this Adoptable storage implemented in Moto X Pure Droid 2 Turbo. Adoptable storage will merge your internal storage with your SD, so your internal storage will be 32gb SD space There ll be no distinction between them. What is shown in this post is the good and old move to SD that has been present since ICS or GB It only moves some part of the app to the SD. That might be a better idea than Adoptable Storage for the average folks Less confusion. Me personally, I d be fine Currently my 6p I ve only used 10GB. Yes That s better Is there a noticeable difference in speed opening the apps from the microSD card vs internal storage. i would say it really depends on the app and the sd card. it s technically slower especially compared to UFS 2 but for most apps, i can t really see it being an issue provided you re using a fast SD card. I have two microSD cards waiting for the S7 edge The first one is a UFS-3, Class 10 64GB microSD card I ll use that one for 4K video recording, if I ever need to record in 4K The second one is a UFS-1, Class 10 200GB microSD card That ll be my main one for the phone for photos, apps, HD video, music, etc. i have a UFS-3 64gb card im going to use i figure 96GB of space should be plenty, if i need more space, by then prices will have dropped and speeds will have gone up. im pretty sure either of those cards should work fine with little to no real noticeable slowdown. Tried it on sd card and internal with insta and clash of clans and didn t notice a real difference in load time to open the app That s not scientific or anything but I don t think it makes a real difference. I am fed up with pre-loaded bloatware I think I may be done with Samsung and will look seriously at the next Nexus device. You are wrong there In the past up to S5 that I checked , it moved core app files to SD, but problem was that those core files are small ones usually app itself If that app download lot of data AFTER it is started, that data remains to internal SD mostly in Android obb and Android data folders. In other words, for most large games that download hundreds of MB after first start, you will move only 10 of game to external SD, and all those hundreds of MB will remain on internal storage. TLDR move app to external SD may move only small part of app to external and keep MOST of large app on internal SD. Would u happen to know an app that can multi-select apps to move to SD card Clean Master has a feature that uninstalls or force closes multiple apps with minimal user interaction. Link2SD can batch move apps to SD, aside from it s main root-required feature make symlinks and move the apps to an external SD hidden partition kinda like a make-shift adoptable storage. Yikes One of the reasons I won t buy a Samsung device They ve made impressive devices so far this year though. So if you can move apps but not delete why cant you move them to the SD card and then format it to erase them. About Droid Life. Well , sometimes it is really useful to make averaging in the software, especially in cases when you use one or several analog values in calculation and then result of calculation is used elsewhere in the software In that case it is really nice to have function for averaging What I use is exponential averaging This method is mainly used in electronics and it is basically the same what RC filter does Please look at the following links. Also you can find nice discussion in Siemens forums here. Searching over the internet also gives a lot of results of how to implement this method I have created special function in LAD for execute exponential smoothing and it works like a charm. Last edited by Darius at 2 2 2017 9 10 07 AM. You can implement MAV very easily and in an efficient way The pseudocode is below. PULSE is a one-shot pulse which trigger AI acquisition. INIT F FirstScan Fill AIBuffer, AIValue Sum AIValue AIBufferLength Average AIValue. Calculation - called at fixed interval IF Pulse Temp AIBuffer AIPointer AIBuffer AIPointer AIValue Sum Sum AIValue-Temp Average Sum AIBufferLength if AIPointer AIBufferLength AIPointer 0.AIBuffer is array which cover period of your avwerage, indexed from 0 to Length-1 AIPointer is an int variable STAT which points to last processed element Sum is a REAL STAT variable which holds current Sim Average is a REAL STAT which gives your averaged input. This way it will not consume too much PLC time - it is much faster than making sums in every scan. I use the moving average to detect high noise on thermocouples input in heating application the noise is present when TC is dirty and makes bad contact with the workpiece. Last edited by Piotr M at 2 2 2017 9 18 45 AM. Thank you Piotr M.- What is Fill AIbuffer, AIraw - I guess you mean IF firstscan - So I shuld make this Firstscan in the calculation IF-sentence such that i just get a value when the first calculation is done Check out the bold text below. IF Pulse firstscan 1 Temp AIBuffer AIPointer AIBuffer AIPointer AIValue Sum Sum AIValue-Temp Average Sum AIBufferLength if AIPointer AIBufferLength AIPointer 0.You can implement MAV very easily and in an efficient way The pseudocode is below. PULSE is a one-shot pulse which trigger AI acquisition. INIT F FirstScan Fill AIBuffer, AIValue Sum AIValue AIBufferLength Average AIValue. Calculation - called at fixed interval IF Pulse Temp AIBuffer AIPointer AIBuffer AIPointer AIValue Sum Sum AIValue-Temp Average Sum AIBufferLength if AIPointer AIBufferLength AIPointer 0.AIBuffer is array which cover period of your avwerage, indexed from 0 to Length-1 AIPointer is an int variable STAT which points to last processed element Sum is a REAL STAT variable which holds current Sim Average is a REAL STAT which gives your averaged input. This way it will not consume too much PLC time - it is much faster than making sums in every scan. I use the moving average to detect high noise on thermocouples input in heating application the noise is present when TC is dirty and makes bad contact with the workpiece.- What is Fill AIbuffer, AIraw. There is SFC21 FILL instruction which you can use.-I guess you mean IF firstscan. YES You need generate firstscan bit which is one for 1st scan of OB1 after PLC start. if First Scan is True do the Init Otherwise skip it. First Scan Generation. in OB100 Power-up OB set First Scan Bit to True. in LAST NETWORK of OB1 reset first scan bit to False. The posted code is a pseudocode i e how to do things You will need write it with. a proper SCL symtax i e. What is Fill AIbuffer, AIraw. There is SFC21 FILL instruction which you can use That Fill instruction is not supported to my cpu s7-1200 it says I tried fillblk instead It needs 3 parameters to the function and not 2 as we are using now. FILLBLK Byte, Uint, Byte It needs IN, COUNT and OUT. Have we missed anything here It looks like FILLBLK does not support arrays.-I guess you mean IF firstscan. YES You need generate firstscan bit which is one for 1st scan of OB1 after PLC start. if First Scan is True do the Init Otherwise skip it Check code at the bottom. First Scan Generation. in OB100 Power-up OB set First Scan Bit to True. in LAST NETWORK of OB1 reset first scan bit to False. Check image the Reset is now moved to the end of OB1 btw Is it sufficient. The posted code is a pseudocode i e how to do things You will need write it with. a proper SCL symtax i e.
No comments:
Post a Comment